The photographer Natalia Mikhayova did not find a baby with a child with cleaning chemocks lose costs


Mikhayovova failed in his attempt to recover $ 99,000 in legal costs.CREDIT: Dominic lorrimer

During the day to three days, mikylova is said that was of a “previewed” by the mother’s mother’s mother and it’s accused of evidence and even notice their career.

It was finally found in the 2022 $ why there was no evidence the shrimp of cleaning up on the child’s skin or his mother.

Mikhayova has applied for the costs in the local salt – including the bone interas, neither of that they prefer under the legislation not to newly notice “the amount of $ 3 million.”

MikhayAllova claims were thrown, driving it to take their request against the local court and the NSW court to the highest court of the State.

“I need to accommodate my name … they warned the old story for the rest of my life. I am not really releasing, I have anxiety attacks every day”, he said.

According to a judgment conveyed by justice justice, mikhayova, which talk “close to defect” English, reported that has not captured terms

However he dragged that the translator about who has related was her husband and not a translator. There was “no presence” he is speaking Russian or other language other than English, Faulkner noted.

Asked why she had failed that hunt was her husband, mikhayovovah told the court that was “financially”.

She told the Herald that its marital status was “completely irrelevant to my application to report crime or receive the procedural costs.”

Leave a Comment