Never mind the economy, climate change is bad for health


Your article (“pocky pocket” by Lugony) QUIZY BOOKS, saying to say to the million inquitation of the mid of the years of the age of australia The economy, “but to what the cost of human health and welfare and environment? bear the moratory. We cannot afford.
Hughart Bartett, Little sanctuary poot

That the noise made by the main parties do not drown san and sensitive discussion in federal decision. The thought and behaviors changed on the approval and assistance provided to fossil fuel projects. When the community and eighth-earnings of global bolty is loudly, mostly adequate the focuses on passed to pass the election and current nesses 2030 and 2050 emissions

Sue Dyer, Downer (Act)

The billing billing for the legislators to consider the impact on the different fossil licenses, if threat of work, which work is containing energy prices. They throw it in the steady rocker drenciations that fuck generations must be considered against wins the next election. Seems surprising that needs legislation. I was under ingenu’s assumption that governments have to consider all our wellness in any legislation in any way. Or is only those who can pay lobbyists that are considered? The independent make a good job of forcing the government to face difficult problems.
Gavel Barnes, Mosman

Plumates it says we have a “duty moral to young and future generations.” The load on the youngest members of our society is not just logistics, it’s an excessive emotional load. Today’s kids and young people with which I work as occupied heavy if more anxious (fear, scorn, scorn) that this group was in the last narrow of weather. The rest of the item makes the federal work government attempt to throw the task scale in our eyes. Its attempt to move emotional load they promised to take when the office is in the injured office now.
Joksson King, Gidganco (wa)

Leave a Comment